1 source filed · EN 1
802 adults held 866 conversations across three arms (standard agent, concise agent, control).
802US adults randomised across a structured visit-preparation agent (two variants) and a plain chatbot on the same model
1 source filed · EN 1
154 residents assessed, 132 randomized 1:1:1, 123 analyzed (mean age 24.1, 65 women; 60 radiology, 63 non-radiology), all with under 3 years of experience.
40.1% / 40.4% vs 20.0%radiology residents' accuracy on cases where GPT-5.4 was wrong, with two AI suggestions vs one
1 source filed · EN 1
Without AI, higher-education participants score 0.548 SD above lower-education participants; with AI, the gap is 0.139 SD, closing 75% of it.
0.548 SD to 0.139 SDeducation performance gap without vs with AI access, about 75% closed